SAM Magazine–August 1, 2011–The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a federal judge’s ruling in favor of Copper Mountain, Colo., which dismissed a lawsuit brought against the ski area after a 2006 accident. According to the AP, the lawsuit was filed by Dr. Rajeev Kumar and claimed the resort was negligent in not expressly labeling a cornice as dangerous (he was injured skiing off of one). The appeals judges ruled that Colorado’s Ski Safety Act prohibits claims based on dangers inherent to skiing, like going off a cornice, and that the cornice did not qualify as a “specified freestyle terrain area,” subject to labeling. The judges did note that they didn’t rule whether the cornice qualifies as “extreme terrain.”
Copper Wins Appeal
SAM Magazine–August 1, 2011–The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a federal judge’s ruling in favor of Copper Mountain, Colo., which dismissed a lawsuit brought against the ski area after a 2006 accident. According to the AP, the lawsuit…




